**********************************************************
해외입양아동 수는 보건복지부의 통계에 의하면 1953년부터 2005년까지 총 15만8703명이었다. 이 중 혼혈 어린이는 1955년부터 1973년까지 내보내졌고, 총 5546명이었다. 정부의 또다른 통계에 따르면, 1958년부터 지금까지 입양 보낸 아동 중 비혼모아동은 9만8178명, 결손가정아동이 2만8823명, 버려진 아동이 2만9950명이었으며 전체 숫자 가운데 장애아동은 3만7216명이었다.
My translation:
According to statistics from the
28,823 from poor families,
abandoned children 29,950 and of the whole number there were 37,216 handicapped children.
Let me break those official stats down into percentages.
Mixed race: 3.49%
Unwed mothers: 61.86%
Poor: 18.16%
Abandoned: 18.87%
Handicapped: 23.45%
So, unwed mothers is by and large the biggest issue. Mixed race is without a doubt the smallest issue. If you live in Seoul or meet a lot of adoptees that is not really a surprise.
What is a surprise is — how many handicapped kids? Almost 1 in 4? Wow, that is a lot of handicapped kids. That’s almost a quarter of all adoptees! But where are all those handicapped adoptees? When we go to an adoptee gathering, are 1 in 4 adoptees whom we meet handicapped? Sure, there are people living with visible handicaps that we know, but not 1 in 4. Hmmmm….. what’s going on?
Here are some facts on handicap and adoptees from the 2009 National Assembly audit. We got the info in Korean and I translated it into an understandable English expression.
1. Classifications of adoptees | |||||||||
(Dec. 31, 2008, # of people) | |||||||||
agency | total | sex | state of family | state of health | |||||
M | F | Unwed mother | Lost child, poverty | Broken family | normal | handicapped | |||
total | 1,250 | 773 | 477 | 1,114 | 10 | 126 | 1,126 | 124 | |
Holt | 503 | 308 | 195 | 394 | 5 | 104 | 425 | 78 | |
Eastern | 336 | 209 | 127 | 329 | 5 | 2 | 307 | 29 | |
SWS | 378 | 240 | 138 | 358 | - | 20 | 361 | 17 | |
KSS | 33 | 16 | 17 | 33 | - | - | 33 | - |
3. State of overseas adoptees’ prematurity and type of handicap from 2006 ~ June 2009
total | subtotal | premature | handicapped children | normal | |||||
harelip | Hand foot | mental handicap | heart problem | etc. | |||||
2006 | 1,899 | 713 | 303 | 21 | 7 | 24 | 86 | 272 | 1186 |
2007 | 1,264 | 500 | 222 | 4 | 9 | 15 | 41 | 209 | 764 |
2008 | 1,250 | 124 | 48 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 18 | 37 | 1126 |
June 2009 | 679 | 40 | 19 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 639 |
It’s important to note that “premature” are counted as part of the total statistic of “handicapped.” (See how the 124 matches up.)
Here’s what’s interesting:
What happened to the definition of “premature” between 2007 and 2008? A change of 222 to 48 cannot mean a change in actual condition. A change that large can only mean a change in definition. This change in definition caused the number of “handicapped” children to drop from 500 in 2007 to 124 in 2008.
What was the definition of “premature” in 2007, and what did it change to in 2008? Does this mean that many “handicapped” children sent from Korea were not severely handicapped, and not in a life-or-death situation, but were just … small?
That’s what I’m wondering. Some other things that I think are whack on here – since when in the world’s greatest plastic surgery mecca should a harelip (Cleft Lip) be a problem? Maybe back in the day, but in 2008 — ??
I apologize for my language. I realize I’ve been living in Korea for 5 years now so I have no idea anymore if “mixed race” or “handicapped” or “harelip/(cleftlip)” etc. are correct terms in English anymore. As you know my head is a complete language mess. Please somebody correct my language if it’s offensive or out of date. Thanks. Anyone else who has more or different statistics — please know I am all in favor of sharing knowledge and please do share if you have.
*Statistics from the 2009 National Assembly audit,
1. 성별, 발생유형별, 아동상태별 입양실적 | ||||||||||
(2008.12.31, 명) | ||||||||||
기관명 | 계 | 성 별 | 발생유형별 | 아동상태별 | ||||||
남 | 여 | 미혼모아등 | 기아. 빈곤 | 결손 가정 | 비장애 | 장애 | ||||
계 | 1,250 | 773 | 477 | 1,114 | 10 | 126 | 1,126 | 124 | ||
홀 트 | 503 | 308 | 195 | 394 | 5 | 104 | 425 | 78 | ||
동 방 | 336 | 209 | 127 | 329 | 5 | 2 | 307 | 29 | ||
대 한 | 378 | 240 | 138 | 358 | - | 20 | 361 | 17 | ||
한 국 | 33 | 16 | 17 | 33 | - | - | 33 | - |
3. 06년 ~09.6월 연도별 해외입양아 중 미숙아 또는 조숙아, 장애유형별 장애아 등 현황
계 | 소계 | 미숙아/조숙아 | 장애아 | 정상아 | |||||
언청이 | 손발기형 | 정신 장애 | 심장병 | 기타 | |||||
2006년 | 1,899 | 713 | 303 | 21 | 7 | 24 | 86 | 272 | 1186 |
2007년 | 1,264 | 500 | 222 | 4 | 9 | 15 | 41 | 209 | 764 |
2008년 | 1,250 | 124 | 48 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 18 | 37 | 1126 |
2009년 6월 | 679 | 40 | 19 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 639 |
The KWB also wonders about some of these facts...I believe that "premature" children are NOT wanted by Korean people who would worry about the health of the child. The infants would not be adopted by the 5th month period and then would be LEFT-OVER (sorry this is a harsh term, but reality) and now available for adoption Overseas since the DEMAND was exceeded by SUPPLY.
Koreans put much emphasis on the education of their children, and perfect health. I would suggest that the Premature are not considered healthy enough by many (97% of Disabled children ARE sent Overseas)What? A Cliff oh CLEFT LIP.
Not all Korean people feel that way today but those who want to adopt in many countries also tend to want ones with no "problems". Still the stats show that overwhelmingly the figures are THIS:
Circumstances of Adoption, 1995-2007 |
Domestic Adoptions | Overseas Adoptions | |||||||||
Year | Reason for Relinquishment | Condition of Child | Reason for Relinquishment | Condition of Child | ||||||
연도 | Unwed Mother | Instit. | Poverty | Disabled* | Unwed Mother | Abandoned | Poverty | Disabled* | ||
미혼모 | 시설 | 극빈가정 | 정상 | 장애* | 미혼모 | 기아 등 | 극빈가정 | 정상 | 장애* | |
1995 | 680 | 297 | 48 | 997 | 28 | 2,019 | 21 | 140 | 1,135 | 1,045 |
1996 | 906 | 271 | 52 | 1,212 | 17 | 1,916 | 26 | 138 | 1,145 | 935 |
1997 | 1,064 | 258 | 90 | 1,400 | 12 | 2,018 | 8 | 31 | 1,273 | 784 |
1998 | 1,067 | 287 | 72 | 1,420 | 6 | 2,271 | 9 | 163 | 1,526 | 917 |
1999 | 1,369 | 199 | 158 | 1,712 | 14 | 2,253 | 5 | 151 | 1,584 | 825 |
2000 | 1,350 | 234 | 102 | 4,668 | 18 | 2,356 | 2 | 2 | 1,726 | 634 |
2001 | 1,428 | 221 | 131 | 1,756 | 14 | 2,434 | 1 | 1 | 1,693 | 743 |
2002 | 1,344 | 203 | 60 | 1,678 | 16 | 2,364 | 1 | 1,538 | 827 | |
2003 | 1,181 | 210 | 173 | 1,544 | 20 | 2,283 | 2 | 2 | 1,638 | 649 |
2004 | 1,250 | 236 | 155 | 1,634 | 7 | 2,257 | 1 | 1,553 | 705 | |
2005 | 1,095 | 172 | 194 | 1,434 | 27 | 2,069 | 4 | 28 | 1,364 | 737 |
Total | 12,734 | 2,588 | 1,235 | 19,455 | 179 | 24,240 | 79 | 657 | 16,175 | 8,801 |
Note: "Disabled or Handicapped" "Special Needs" were only 179 Domestic adoptions compared to 8,801 (more than 50% of the NORMAL) for InterCountryAdoptions.
BUT Who can blame a Korean woman faced with such a decision? I the KWB DO NOT!!! She gave the gift of life by not aborting,(Frank Gets THE CALL) then made the Choice to give up for adoption, not knowing if it would be here In-Country or Overseas adoption. She perhaps was hoping that in another country a family would ADOPT or "Take by Choice" her child. It is not about "lucky to be adopted" NO, NO, NO.
Adopted and became a Prince of Egypt.
So
Yet The Korean War Baby does not hold animosity toward the 1,000 (Government figures) or the 4,000 (Pro-Life doctors OB/GYN) PREGNANT KOREAN
These
Does anyone have more information on this subject, or voice your opinion.
Don, Sorry actually this is my translation. The govt just says "장애인." Would it be better for me to translate as "special needs" or "handicapped"? I am a language mess and completely confused on what is politically correct. Some people seem to think that there is a difference between and "special needs" or "handicapped." I am just thinking 장애인 .... help me. ....
ReplyDeleteJang Ae In usually is translated into "Disabled" still on for instance Elevators and the special seats at the end of each subway car.
ReplyDeleteIn American it used to be Politically Correct to say "Handicapped", then it became "Something Challenged" like a sort of tongue in cheek kind of light humor.
This from a BBC article: "Handicapped" is a word which many disabled people consider to be the equivalent of nigger. It evokes thoughts of being held back, not in the race, not as good, weighed down by something so awful we ought not to speak of it.
Yet some "Disabled persons don't like Special Needs either. The American Psychological Association style guide states that, when identifying a person with an impairment, the person's name or pronoun should come first, and descriptions of the impairment/disability should be used so that the impairment is identified. more acceptable terminology includes "a woman with Down syndrome".
Interestingly many people are across the board with their own terminology, but most that I have personally known, desire to be just NORMAL.
I wonder if SOME of us Adoptees would also like the Korean Society to ONE DAY, think of us as "Oh, you grew up in Los Angeles, California. I have been to Disneyland!" You know just accepted as a Part Korean.
I sіmply could not leave your site ρrioг to suggеsting that I extremelу enjoyеd the usuаl infoгmation an іndіviduаl ρrovіde fог yоuг vіsitοrs?
ReplyDeleteIѕ gоing tο be baсk oftеn
to check up οn new ρosts
Have а look at my blog ... payday loans